Para's in Dox -v- White Horse

It was natural that when the children came to talk to the orthodox Christians; that a lot would take place and each would defend their realities. When the children and the old ones go head to head, other Christians step in to try to stop what is taking place. Did the Apostles try to stop Jesus from sharing his truth? Why then do the orthodox try to stop the children?

So what do they do? The ones that step in between the orthodox men and the spiritual children then cite a verse on wisdom. The 'paradox' of the bible and the Americans, interesting that there is a 'dox' at the end of 'orthodox' and a 'dox' at the end of 'paradox'. As we know there are plenty of 'Para's involved in American Christianity and its politics due to the sheer numbers of its military operations.

If you look at the word 'paradox' on wiki it shares with us that this form is common in 'howlers', funny then that there was a Christian that used the avatar name 'howler' that stood against yours truly and the children.

I like this offering from wiki, it made me smile!

A taste for paradox is central to the philosophies of Laozi, Heraclitus, Meister Eckhart, Hegel, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, and G.K. Chesterton, among many others. Søren Kierkegaard, for example, writes, in the Philosophical Fragments, that

But one must not think ill of the paradox, for the paradox is the passion of thought, and the thinker without the paradox is like the lover without passion: a mediocre fellow. But the ultimate potentiation of every passion is always to will its own downfall, and so it is also the ultimate passion of the understanding to will the collision, although in one way or another the collision must become its downfall. This, then, is the ultimate paradox of thought: to want to discover something that thought itself cannot think.

When a young one said to me that she had it all figured out and it is all to do with thought. I asked her to go away and come back when she knows what comes before the thought. Of course she was on a collision course, because instead of concentrating on healing herself, she was trying to comprehend the physics of the cosmos. Hence the difference between the way of life and the way of death. The way of life has a passion for healing, the way of death has a passion for knowing everything. Aristotle said 'Men seek to know', in other words they seek to know for themselves and what they can manifest from it. Yet, what Jesus taught was to seek within, to heal and become whole again so that people could be born again a Spirit of God. As he said to the orthodox Nicodemus, 'the Spirit is like the wind, you do not know where it has come from and you do not know where it is going'.

He said that because Jesus was talking about his gnosis based upon experience that the orthodox Nicodemus could never comprehend without the experience to do so.

The text that the Mormon cited is from James. 'The wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be entreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality and without hypocrisy. And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that made peace'. James 3:17-18

So let us take that one step at a time. First and most importantly, it states that 'The wisdom that is from above is first pure'. The word 'wisdom' is found in the text, so then they write that wisdom is in the book. Do they know the difference between a book and above? Do they know the difference between the earthly and the heavenly? Wasn't the paper in the book made from trees?

The bible mentions celestial realities but the book is not celestial. The ancient texts mentions Angels but the texts are not Angels. The texts mentions the heavens, but a book is not the heavens. In my humble view in James 3, James is trying to help his followers to comprehend the difference between the celestial realms and the earthly realms. Do Christians comprehend it? Will they ever comprehend it, if the Christians only term of reference is a single book?

'PARA's in DOX' 

4th May, 2013 

The text of James speaks of 'peaceable' and that is to do with healing and wholeness. Jesus the Israeli enabled people to attain wholeness with his teachings of the root of shalom, 'be whole'. As such, to be peaceable, meant to be whole. In wholeness there is peace when people have made peace with themselves. The best questions to ask, is to ask yourselves the questions. However, being able to ask the right questions is when you get the right responses.

James mentions, 'gentle', gentle is to do with the heart and soul. The gentleness of the sensitive, sincere, innocent healers. Like the gentleness and innocence of a child, sensitive to the energies in its environment.

'The fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that made peace'

Another 'biblical paradox', because people have to make peace with themselves, prior to receiving what is sown in peace. In real terms, it is only when people have become healed and whole that they made peace with themselves and others. Then the fruit of righteousness can be sown in that wholeness.

Its like saying that you have to have a round basket for me to put the fruit in. Or you have to have a whole plate of consciousness for the fruit to be received divinely. However, from experience I know that the healers have the fruit put into their hands and on their hearts. Buddha like Jesus understood righteousness very well indeed, and it is to with the spiritual law.

The Christian orthodox are trying to find a way to contain its children due to the paradigm shift that is taking place. However, the children were given their divine plan in September 2007. The children have a new trustful loyalty in the celestial realms based upon experience,  and the pure that come from it.

The horse has to be able to be free and gallop with the wind in its mane. That is why the white horse is called 'Faithful and True'.

Now there is a Derby horse race in Kentucky today, will Ryan win?