Thursday 9 May 2019

Don't Over Medicalise University Students

I totally agree with Sir Simon Wessely, who is the regius professor of psychiatry at King's College London, he warned universities that they must not "over medicalise" the normal emotions of young adults.

I would say the same about school children too, the way that children learn to manage their emotions is by experiencing them and working through them. It's all part of the process of growing up on the rite of passage. Maturing takes time and our children have to be given that time to evolve at their own pace.

As far as Rachel Hewitt, the author of the Hepi report, it is another case of the "hi-jacking" of a mystical spiritual reality of "well-being" and the prophecy that was given by Prophet Isaiah.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2019/05/09/universities-risk-damaging-students-giving-unnecessary-counselling/

Prophet Isaiah knew that stepping on the highway to holiness was not for everyone, and Jesus knew that too when he said that the workers are few.  He was talking about his spiritual healers that are helping the poor. The middle class can afford complimentary medicine therapies, the poor cannot, another reason why the Apostles complained when Magdalene put healing oils on the feet of Jesus due to the cost of the oils.

I would ask the university students how much self-nurturing do you do? And some of the happiest students tend to be those that are still living at home while they are doing their degrees. While they are still living at home they tend to still receive their tender loving care and are fed properly.

Nutrition is incredibly important while they are growing into adults and their brains are not fully developed until the age of 25. For that reason I think that every individual should have some work experience prior to going to university.

Work experience at the earliest possible age. Part-time work for teenagers helped to give our generation the work ethic. It also helped to co-create confident individuals and brought forth natural talents. It helped teenagers to decide what they liked and what they didn't like about the work environment and that helps with making the right choice of degrees and careers.

Although when choosing a career it does help if they have access to a range of people that have had a lot of experience in the industry that they might be interested in so that they can explore the opportunities that are available. There has been far too much social engineering in schools and it began in the 20th century. Who was involved in social engineering? Corporations in hand with successive governments.

Also safety and security is most important for most people and campuses have become a lot less safe due to immigration. Young people have been "Bullied" by immigrants up and down the country, not only in universities but also in colleges too.

It was years ago when a university lecturer shared that most degree students choose the degree that their parents would like them to do, instead of what their real passion is. Follow your hearts and be what you were born to be. As I used to say to our young people twenty years ago, don't let anyone "label" you.

Every individual has a life path to follow, you just have to be able to access it and your natural talents, to include what motivates you. I remember my own son nearly went into the army and I asked him what his motivation was for being attracted to it.

I asked him if it was for his IT qualifications, why didn't he go for a degree course instead? I asked him if was for the financial security, was the physical, emotional and mental risk involved worth it?

I asked him to seriously consider what his motivations were prior to making a serious decision and I knew that he had the intelligence to do a degree course.

In the end he did apply for an IT degree course as a mature student and the university turned him down. Not enough degree places for our people were there, far too many foreign students. Perhaps if he had a foreign name and was a different colour, they would have offered him a placement.

Now the indigenous children in London are only 10% of the children in the class, now a minority in their own capital city.  The latest research is that the white boys are lagging behind their ethnic counterparts due to the sheer amount of money that has been thrown at it in London.

Things have to change and we have to have a government that puts our country, people and culture first. Interesting that the globalists are not socialists, as the original founder of the Labour Party, Keir Hardie was against immigration and emigration, that is a fact that many in the Labour party would not like.

Also how is that that the Muslim community was put above and ahead of the Windrush community?

Shouldn't the Windrush community that traveled on British passports have more priority than those that came afterwards? Shouldn't those that speak English impeccably, and respect the country, culture and democracy that they were born into also be given a priority.

Why don't we have more from that community in the justice system and in all levels of government? Why do we not have them sitting on the bench? You can't judge all of them on the basis of the words and deeds of David Lammy, and Diane Abbot.

First come, first served, principle.




No comments:

Post a Comment