OBAMACARE -v- NHS

A lot as been written about Obamacare in America. The American medical and pharmaceutical profession that is created for profit for the insurance companies, that don't always pay up when a person requires it. It reminds me of buildings and car insurance in the UK, where the insurance companies will do everything they can to not pay up. That's what happens when "Insurance" is involved in your lives, and you have to make a claim upon it.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/30/doctors-affirm-obamacare-nothing-healthcare/

The Son of Joseph did not support or believe in the "insurance" industry. The only insurance that he ever had was for the car, for the protection of others, just in case. Of course, it is also a legal requirement in the UK.

My view is that the whole industry requires a "new economic blueprint" that is aimed at serving the people, rather than the people serving it. I remember when Michael Lerner (USA) sent out an email when he required financial help to pay for the pharmaceuticals that he required, after he received treatment for "cancer".

In the UK, we have a completely different system to America, we pay a % of our salaries into the community pot, that community pot then pays for healthcare for all of our people.

People that can afford to pay, do pay a little prescription charge for their pharmaceuticals, a little towards it. The last time I looked, it was still under £10.00 per prescription. No charge for children and no charge for pensioners. You can also get an annual that costs about £90 for the year, if you require a lot and can afford it. Some people can even get exemption from all payment.

The reason why Americans stand against our socialised national health care system in the UK, they don't trust their government to spend the money wisely on health. Although overall, I think we pay a lot less than they do in America for healthcare. It would be interesting to see a comparative study done, on who pays more.

I think the pharmaceutical industry has to be seriously looked at and changed legally. I think profit should be taken out of that industry, the pharmaceutical industry should be "not-for-profit." I'm sure Ben Carson would have a view on that. Ben Carson (USA) is one of the leading children's surgeons in the world.

The same for the rest of their healthcare and its technology. We cannot continue with a system, whereby it is more profitable for people to remain ill. Only when that system changes can we make huge strides in solving many different health conditions.

We cannot have a situation whereby a product is banned in America, then sold to women in third world countries. That is what the American corporations have been doing. If a product isn't good enough for American women, then it is not good enough for women in India or any other country either. The world is a much smaller place now than it was before, and the whistleblowers are sharing the truth with the world.

America and its corporations, cannot get away with what it has done in the past, the people are on it.

ANGELS of COLOUR 

Yea, American contraceptive products were put into American women, they got "cancerous cells", the product was banned after the court cases and American outrage.

It also happened to women in the UK, and the rest of Europe. America owes us women a lot. I can forgive, America, I cannot forget what was done to our women, including myself in the name of wealth creation for America.

No more wealth creation on the backs of poor Europeans, America. No more banned products to be sent to third world countries either. Take your banned for profit products back America, no more life sentence for women, no more executions.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahBkCnw7k9Y