TOMMY WINS CASE -v- MET POLICE

English barrister, Blackbelt barrister recaps on the Met Police case -v- Tommy Robinson, now that Tommy won the case this morning. 6mins 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnYnzJs7I9Q

No one has mentioned the fact that when the police went to arrest Tommy, he was having breakfast in a Cafe. His intention was to do some journalism after he had eaten his breakfast with his friend Richard. Suddenly the police burst in telling him to leave the area. Has Daniel confirms there is no law against being a journalist. I agree with Daniel the police did waste court time, when you consider that there are 67,000 cases waiting to go to court and 10,000 of those cases are rape cases. 

Tommy's case was dismissed by the District Judge at Westminster Magistrates court. The Magistrates blog has featured a blogpost on why the police were beaten with the truth. 

https://magistrates.blogspot.com/2024/04/tommy-robinson-cleared-police-dispersal-direction.html

Tommy is within his legal rights to seek compensation for the "unlawful arrest" and "harassment" that which he suffered in the hands of the police. Sadly, "unlawful arrests", are nor rare, they are quite common. It is the Met police force and CPS that must get its own house in order.  

This case they brought against Tommy Robinson has made the Met police and CPS a laughing stock. If we cannot rely on the police or CPS to stand in integrity, then the way is to keep on suing them until they do so. Although police and CPS involved in this case should resign, if not sack them, they themselves are not above the law, they must be held accountable. 

Also there has to be an end to two-tier pier policing. I watched the London rally today, how the police created a blockade in Whitehall to stop people walking freely up and down Whitehall. It was clear provocation from the Met Police. There were people coming from Trafalgar Square to meet up with people that arrived from Waterloo and neither group could walk on Whitehall to meet with each other. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZvZWUZFevI

ENGLISHNESS - WHAT IS IT?

This is a good video on what it means to be English, English identity in 4mins. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yf3xBO4uq0I

GLOUCESTER POLICE & CRIME COMMISSIONER

Independent, Matthew Randolph (from a police family) is standing has a candidate for Gloucester Police and Crime Commissioner on the 2nd May. His candidacy was funded by the general public. It costs £5,000 to stand as a Police and Crime Commissioner. 

Council watch uploaded the interview and YT deleted it. The interview has now been uploaded to Odysee and this is a link to it. Have a listen if you are interested in the matter. 

21mins 

https://odysee.com/@CCCWatch:0/big-bbc-backfire:c

After the interview, Matthew shares that he has made a complaint to the police about the BBC and they are investigating various matters that he has raised. 

CARER'S ALLOWANCE DEBATE

A livestream of the parliamentary debate on the Carer's Allowance following an E-petition due to Carer's being penalised by DWP. In the UK, pensioners aren't even allowed to claim a Carer's allowance. 

I know a pensioner that looks after her disabled son 24/7 because he didn't want to live in a residential home anymore. She's been looking after since him turned 21 and he is now 36 years old, he wasn't even receiving PIP until 2023, although she had tried many times to get DWP to consider his case. His mother has saved social services a huge amount by him not being put in residential care. 

In 2024/25, Carer's allowance is worth £81.90 a week, not a lot for 24.7 care. Carer's Allowance is a payment to people for caring "regularly and substantially' for a person who receives a qualifying disability benefit. It is an "income replacement benefit", designed to provide financial support who give up the chance to work full-time in order to provide care. 

The Government's response - given on 23rd October, 2023 - stated that Carer's Allowance was a "benefit that provides some financial recognition that a carer may not be able to work full-time", and was part of "a range of support based on individual needs, rather than a wage". It said the Government fully recognised the "invaluable contribution" and "vital role" of unpaid and family carers. 

https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cdp-2024-0078/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZur4VsShYc

My own mother was a carer for her mother and her aunt, there were no carer's allowance in those days, in fact, it was introduced in 1976. Not only that but she also cared for my dad after he had been diagnosed with cancer, has far as I'm aware she didn't receive any carer's allowance for looking after dad either. He passed over at age 57 in the 80s, not only that but they didn't receive any of his pension either. Even though he started work at age 13, and was a high earner and high tax payer. 

There is going to be a select committee on this matter later in the week and a Carer's Strategy is required and all parties agree. 

MET POLICE "FALSIFIED EVIDENCE" AGAINST TOMMY

It was found in court today that the Met Police "falsified evidence" in the case against Tommy Robinson. 

Tommy says that every action that the police took against him was "unlawful" and in the law of the land that constitutes an "unlawful arrest". Tommy says the court case will probably go on until tomorrow. 

4mins, 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5YaCeOv1tc

This reporter spoke to Tommy before he went into court.  8mins 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZa-sNn4mAw

People that were in court with Tommy today, reported that the MSM journalists were slamming their laptops shut after hearing the evidence against the Met police force. The Sky News reported even left their water bottle behind. None of the MSM were outside the court when Tommy came out of the court. Although there were plenty of citizen journalists, including some from Wales. 

The citizen journalists view this as a very important case for them, because if the police were to get away with what they've done to Tommy, it could then impact on all other citizen journalists that make a living from journalism. It is being viewed as a landmark case. Also bear in mind that Tommy Robinson and Julian Assange are the only two people that haven't had a jury. 

This video is from Tousi TV, Mahyar Tousi talks to Tommy Robinson when he came out of court at the end of the day. Back in court tomorrow morning at  10.30am for the verdict. St George's Day. 

17mins. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbgzcRUeBj8

Tommy's barrister said to the Police Inspector, "This document is not correct is it?. Can we have any confidence that there was a lawful order in place?" The inspector replied, "No".  The general public that sat through the day's hearing said it was "farcical". 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13336869/tommy-robinson-court-accused-breached-order.html

I remember it well, Tommy was sitting having breakfast when all the police charged into arrest him. He wasn't even allowed to eat his breakfast that he had paid for. It was definitely what is known as an "unlawful arrest". 

Potkin was in court watching the case today, he gives us his feedback. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOZ4iu6Dgms

CULTURAL GENOCIDE STATS

What does cultural genocide look like? In our local newspaper last night, stats show only 41% identify has English in our historic town. That is down from 66% in 2016, and down from 80 percent in 2004. 

Nationally, 52% identified as English in 2016. 

Blackbelt Barrister, an English barrister, looks at the brazen theft at the Boots store. Boots whose HQ was in Nottingham is no longer owned by the people of our country. Boots is American owned. 

4mins 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3UrmtZ5ros

Anyone that doesn't defend our country, culture and English people are part of the problem. 

AMERICAN BULLY DOG ATTACKS

Has we know the XL Bully Dog attacks are still happening every week, even after the ban. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13333051/terrifying-XL-Bully-launches-crazed-attack-dogs.html

What most people don't realise is that American Bully dogs are XL's. The XL is an American Bully, they came from Pit Bull Terrier with Bull Dog stock. Yet, the puppies are still being advertised on pet and puppy websites, even though it is illegal to advertise or sell them. 

"The American Bully is typically not a pet for dog parks because of its power and potentially aggressive nature. It requires a secure fenced yard in which to exercise. They are not family dogs due to the sheer power of them and potentially aggressive nature. According to the Orthopedic Foundation for Animals, 43 percent of tested American Bullies have hip dysplasia and 38 per cent have elbow dysplasia. These are high percentages compared with most breeds. Pigment-related deafness is also reported in the breed."

"These dogs were originally bred for blood sports, baiting and dog fighting". 

https://www.britannica.com/animal/American-Bully

Pets4Homes are featuring 186 American bully's for sale. 

Freeads are featuring 164 for sale. 

Preloved are advertising 28. 

Gumtree are advertising 12. 

Many more websites too, put American bullies in the search engine and loads of websites come up. 

The issue is that the foundation of these dogs is the American Pit Bull Terrier and they're also banned in the UK. It is against the law to sell a banned dog. Abandon a banned dog, give away a banned dog, breed from a banned dog. 

https://www.gov.uk/control-dog-public/banned-dogs

All the breeders should receive a visit from the police. Make a report to your local police force that the ads are still appearing on the websites.